<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: schultzzz&#8217;s theory of competition</title>
	<link>http://www.hellodamage.com/cali/2006/05/24/schultzzzs-theory-of-competition/</link>
	<description>カリフォニア報告ーー同じ奴、他の国。</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: earn an income here</title>
		<link>http://www.hellodamage.com/cali/2006/05/24/schultzzzs-theory-of-competition/#comment-347</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hellodamage.com/cali/2006/05/24/schultzzzs-theory-of-competition/#comment-347</guid>
					<description>Daily Adsense Cash
$100 Free Gift - 50% Off Sale.
Only $22.50. Offer Ends Today!
www.adsensemadeeasy.com
http://www.adsensemadeeasy.com/?affid=136</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daily Adsense Cash<br />
$100 Free Gift - 50% Off Sale.<br />
Only $22.50. Offer Ends Today!<br />
<a href='http://www.adsensemadeeasy.com' rel='nofollow'>www.adsensemadeeasy.com</a><br />
<a href='http://www.adsensemadeeasy.com/?affid=136' rel='nofollow'>http://www.adsensemadeeasy.com/?affid=136</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: catwoman</title>
		<link>http://www.hellodamage.com/cali/2006/05/24/schultzzzs-theory-of-competition/#comment-249</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 00:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hellodamage.com/cali/2006/05/24/schultzzzs-theory-of-competition/#comment-249</guid>
					<description>OK, I'll give you the schmoozing points.  But this is true of the majority of successful people in any industry.  Schmoozing is a gift and really I don't think its something you can learn.  You either got it or you don't.  

Based on your reply to my comment you got it.  I'm only telling you this because I know it will piss you off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;ll give you the schmoozing points.  But this is true of the majority of successful people in any industry.  Schmoozing is a gift and really I don&#8217;t think its something you can learn.  You either got it or you don&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>Based on your reply to my comment you got it.  I&#8217;m only telling you this because I know it will piss you off.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: schultzzzzzzz</title>
		<link>http://www.hellodamage.com/cali/2006/05/24/schultzzzs-theory-of-competition/#comment-248</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 20:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hellodamage.com/cali/2006/05/24/schultzzzs-theory-of-competition/#comment-248</guid>
					<description>Hi catwoman!

thanks for not posting your rant in all-caps.

second, i hope you seriously don't expect me to admit any kind of mistake -- this is the INTERNET, after all.  

maybe, though, we actually agree.  maybe we can both be right? if it is only the most well-paid 2% of actors that  make a living . . .  that proves my point about competition. i'm not saying the other 98% are untalented.  and i'm not saying that it isn't hard work.  i just said that a lot of what passes for 'training' is useless hoops set up by middlemen.  but i guess it's also true that like you said, some training is vital to the skill.  

 what i am saying, is that  the successful people are great schmoozers. which takes practice.  and for every minute one spends working on one's shmoozing technique, that's a minute NOT spent improving one's dramatic technique.  if you've ever watched some starlet who can't act well, give a dumb interview and been pissed off that she is a millionaire, then you are basically on my side.  welcome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi catwoman!</p>
<p>thanks for not posting your rant in all-caps.</p>
<p>second, i hope you seriously don&#8217;t expect me to admit any kind of mistake &#8212; this is the INTERNET, after all.  </p>
<p>maybe, though, we actually agree.  maybe we can both be right? if it is only the most well-paid 2% of actors that  make a living . . .  that proves my point about competition. i&#8217;m not saying the other 98% are untalented.  and i&#8217;m not saying that it isn&#8217;t hard work.  i just said that a lot of what passes for &#8216;training&#8217; is useless hoops set up by middlemen.  but i guess it&#8217;s also true that like you said, some training is vital to the skill.  </p>
<p> what i am saying, is that  the successful people are great schmoozers. which takes practice.  and for every minute one spends working on one&#8217;s shmoozing technique, that&#8217;s a minute NOT spent improving one&#8217;s dramatic technique.  if you&#8217;ve ever watched some starlet who can&#8217;t act well, give a dumb interview and been pissed off that she is a millionaire, then you are basically on my side.  welcome!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: catwoman</title>
		<link>http://www.hellodamage.com/cali/2006/05/24/schultzzzs-theory-of-competition/#comment-247</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 16:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hellodamage.com/cali/2006/05/24/schultzzzs-theory-of-competition/#comment-247</guid>
					<description>Ooooooohhhhh, I might have to leave you in a huff over this one..  You are completely wrong about actors.  Of course there are the few who get discovered while doing something entirely different but those seem to be the flash-in-the-pan careers.  The 2%  - YES 2 fucking percent - of SAG (Screen Actor's Guild) actors who actually earn their total living through acting (and this includes the Tom Cruises, the Dustin Hoffmans, the Al Pachinos, the Meryl Streeps, the Nicole Kidmans, the . . . shall I go on here? - can you count the number of actors who make movies?) are the exception to actors.  The vast majority of us spend years studying EVERYTHING.  You have to play a brilliant mathemetician?  You need to have a background in this to draw on it.  You want to play a president?  In order to be &quot;real&quot; - to give a true performance you must have some base of knowledge.  Actors need to know everything and be willing always to learn more.

I spent 8 years studying acting and another 12 pursuing it in a very small regional market  Did a few TV shows, one movie, a couple of commercials and fought the rest of the time to pay the fucking rent..  It ain't easy and I am always first in line to correct people when they think it is.  It is an art, and requires studied skill and years of training and a tunnel vision the likes of which you will never know (and neither will I).  And in the end most of us choose to take a fucking shit job that affords us insurance and a paycheck we can rely on rather than pursue that which is in our heart and blood.

So fuck off on this one Schultz.  You are way off base.  Models maybe.  And the wanna be actors for sure.  But the actors who have trained and studied and suffered and sacrificed - jusyt lay off.  You need to post a retraction here my friend.  You are only playing into an ancient -ism against actors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooooooohhhhh, I might have to leave you in a huff over this one..  You are completely wrong about actors.  Of course there are the few who get discovered while doing something entirely different but those seem to be the flash-in-the-pan careers.  The 2%  - YES 2 fucking percent - of SAG (Screen Actor&#8217;s Guild) actors who actually earn their total living through acting (and this includes the Tom Cruises, the Dustin Hoffmans, the Al Pachinos, the Meryl Streeps, the Nicole Kidmans, the . . . shall I go on here? - can you count the number of actors who make movies?) are the exception to actors.  The vast majority of us spend years studying EVERYTHING.  You have to play a brilliant mathemetician?  You need to have a background in this to draw on it.  You want to play a president?  In order to be &#8220;real&#8221; - to give a true performance you must have some base of knowledge.  Actors need to know everything and be willing always to learn more.</p>
<p>I spent 8 years studying acting and another 12 pursuing it in a very small regional market  Did a few TV shows, one movie, a couple of commercials and fought the rest of the time to pay the fucking rent..  It ain&#8217;t easy and I am always first in line to correct people when they think it is.  It is an art, and requires studied skill and years of training and a tunnel vision the likes of which you will never know (and neither will I).  And in the end most of us choose to take a fucking shit job that affords us insurance and a paycheck we can rely on rather than pursue that which is in our heart and blood.</p>
<p>So fuck off on this one Schultz.  You are way off base.  Models maybe.  And the wanna be actors for sure.  But the actors who have trained and studied and suffered and sacrificed - jusyt lay off.  You need to post a retraction here my friend.  You are only playing into an ancient -ism against actors.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Narcoleptic</title>
		<link>http://www.hellodamage.com/cali/2006/05/24/schultzzzs-theory-of-competition/#comment-246</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 01:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hellodamage.com/cali/2006/05/24/schultzzzs-theory-of-competition/#comment-246</guid>
					<description>Steve, yeah, I tend to think you're right.  The disgusting competition inherent in anything remotely related to hollywood has made me want to stay as far away from &quot;the industry&quot; as possible, despite living about three blocks from Hollywood boulevard.

But anyway, your rant reminded me of how in Buddhist cosmology there's supposed to be six realms of existence that you can be reincarnated into.  The human realm is one, but the one immediately above the human realm is the realm of the asuras (also called the jealous gods).  The asuras are ferocious multi-armed godlings who are smarter, stronger and more able to experience pleasure than humans.  They're often painted as being bright red with all these old-school type weapons, wearing golden armor and looking pretty bad-assed.  The problem with asuras, though, is that they spend all their time scheming, fighting, and jockeying for power.  So instead of enjoying their lives as bad-assed bright red super beings, they spend all their karmic goodies on finding ways to get one up on each other.  And what REALLY pisses them off, is that just as we can see animals (supposedly another realm), they can see the devas or the God realm.  The God realm is even better and happier than the asuras, so the asuras are pissed off and jealous their whole lives, even though really they're way better off than us ridiculous humans (and let's not even get into the hell realms...)  Anyway, it seems like maybe this was a way they were trying to explain the detriment of competition-skills on life, except in the context of 5th century BC India.  

Speaking of which, since you just had a religious revelation, maybe you can work this into your own personal Schultzian cosmology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, yeah, I tend to think you&#8217;re right.  The disgusting competition inherent in anything remotely related to hollywood has made me want to stay as far away from &#8220;the industry&#8221; as possible, despite living about three blocks from Hollywood boulevard.</p>
<p>But anyway, your rant reminded me of how in Buddhist cosmology there&#8217;s supposed to be six realms of existence that you can be reincarnated into.  The human realm is one, but the one immediately above the human realm is the realm of the asuras (also called the jealous gods).  The asuras are ferocious multi-armed godlings who are smarter, stronger and more able to experience pleasure than humans.  They&#8217;re often painted as being bright red with all these old-school type weapons, wearing golden armor and looking pretty bad-assed.  The problem with asuras, though, is that they spend all their time scheming, fighting, and jockeying for power.  So instead of enjoying their lives as bad-assed bright red super beings, they spend all their karmic goodies on finding ways to get one up on each other.  And what REALLY pisses them off, is that just as we can see animals (supposedly another realm), they can see the devas or the God realm.  The God realm is even better and happier than the asuras, so the asuras are pissed off and jealous their whole lives, even though really they&#8217;re way better off than us ridiculous humans (and let&#8217;s not even get into the hell realms&#8230;)  Anyway, it seems like maybe this was a way they were trying to explain the detriment of competition-skills on life, except in the context of 5th century BC India.  </p>
<p>Speaking of which, since you just had a religious revelation, maybe you can work this into your own personal Schultzian cosmology.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
